For the last week or so, I’ve been reading Baum’s “The Wizard of Oz” to the kids before they get off to bed. Although I read a couple of the Oz books when I was a kid I don’t think I ever read the one the movie was based on. It’s actually a little less gushy (not so many lovely princesses and darling waifs) than I remember the others being. Also, there are many differences between it and the movie.First off, the famous Ruby Slippers don’t exist. They are Silver Shoes. The Tin Man is the slightly more awkward-sounding “Tin Woodman”. Even the Tin Woodsman would’ve been a little better. And the witch is not the harassing threat she is throughout the movie but only goes after Dorothy and crew after they enter her land basically intent on destroying her.
Speaking of destruction, it’s not the typical fairy tale. The Tin “Woodman” brandishes his axe in every other chapter, mostly cutting wood to make rafts, bridges, and ladders but also severing limbs (well, from mobile trees) and chopping the heads from 40 wolves. The jolly Scarecrow breaks the necks of 40 crows and the Lion snaps the neck of a giant spider.
But the part my kids seem to dig the most we haven’t even got to. It’s the picture to the right of three stoogish guys with no arms (likely victims of the Woodman). They’ve got a little chant complete with strange barking laughs : “We’re the Quadlings! Ha-ha-ha! We’re the Quadlings! Ha-ha-ha!”
Or something like that. The way I wrote it above makes it seem like there's some kind of structure to it.
No structure for the Quadlings!!!

